A new US bill could finally stop publishers from taking away games players paid

Skip to main content

• Trending:
• IFA 2026
• Grand Theft Auto VI
• Six New iPhones For 2027
• Best Mac Utilities
• Best Handheld PCs
• How to Use AI Browsers
• iPhone 17 Alternatives
• Favorite Gemini Prompts
• GPT-5 Explained
• Next Apple TV
• PlayStation 6
• iPhone: What To Know 
• One UI 8
• iPad: What To Know 
• Upcoming Games
• Google Pixel Leaks
• Galaxy Watch 8 Series
• Best Flagship Phone Battery?
• Xbox VR Headset?
• 5 Things the iPhone 17 Needs
• Every iPhone Release

Buying a video game should mean being able to play it, right? Apparently, that comes with an asterisk these days. In a relief to that, US Representative Ritchie Torres has announced the Power To The Players Act, a proposed bill that aims to give gamers stronger ownership rights over the games they buy. Essentially, it would target revocable game licenses and require offline modes before publishers shut down supporting servers. There’s a catch, though: the proposal still needs to be formally introduced and make its way through Congress. So, nobody needs to start celebrating just yet.

Congress wants gamers to own more than a license

The idea behind the Power To The Players Act is simple: if someone pays for a game, they should have a reasonable way to keep playing it. Torres wants consumers to have the right to own, play, and transfer their games. The proposal would also require publishers to provide an offline mode before shutting down a game’s supporting servers. Think of it this way: if a publisher pulls the plug on a game, the single-player campaign shouldn’t automatically go down with it. The exact rules remain unclear, however, because the final bill text hasn’t been made public.

Torres points to NBA 2K25 as an example of the problem. Now that NBA 2K27 is also here, the two-year-old game is scheduled to leave digital storefronts on October 30, 2026, while its online servers are due to shut down on December 31. Once that happens, certain features will become unavailable, potentially leaving players with a much more limited experience. Imagine paying full price for a game, only to discover that part of it comes with an expiration date. Torres argues that this makes modern game purchases feel more like rentals than ownership. And with digital libraries replacing physical shelves, that’s becoming a harder problem for gamers to ignore.

The Stop Killing Games movement has found an ally

The proposal also aligns with the Stop Killing Games movement, which campaigns against publishers making games unplayable after ending support. The concern goes beyond multiplayer matches disappearing. Some games rely on company servers for basic functionality, meaning a shutdown can leave even paying customers locked out. The Power To The Players Act seeks to address that problem while also challenging the broader licensing model behind digital purchases. But it’s still early days: the bill needs to be formally introduced, debated, and passed before any of these protections become law.

Of course, making old games playable isn’t always as simple as flipping an offline switch. Some rely on online infrastructure, licensed content, or systems that were never designed to work without a server. Publishers may argue that maintaining these games indefinitely is costly or technically impractical. The final legislation will need to account for those realities without leaving players empty-handed. And even if the bill passes, that doesn’t automatically mean digital games will become freely resellable like used discs.

Recommended Videos

Still, the proposal raises a question the gaming industry has spent years dodging: if players pay for a game, should a publisher get to decide when they can no longer play it? The Power To The Players Act isn’t law yet, and plenty could change before it gets anywhere close. But at least the debate is moving beyond refund policies and subscription cancellations to something more fundamental.

RELATED COVERAGE:

• California wants to stop publishers from killing online games, and it just made some progress
• EU won’t force publishers to keep games playable, but the Stop Killing Games fight isn’t over
• PlayStation’s disc-killing move may have blindsided the very partners keeping its games business alive
• Xbox’s brand-new feature is rescuing your physical game collection

Varun Mirchandani Varun is an experienced technology journalist and editor with over eight years in consumer tech media. His work spans…

• Gaming

Xbox may finally be giving Game Pass the overhaul it badly needs The planned overhaul could let players pay for individual Game Pass features instead of relying entirely on fixed subscription tiers.

Microsoft has spent years treating Game Pass as the centerpiece of Xbox, but the subscription service has become something of a problem for the company. Subscriber growth has fallen far short of internal expectations, while putting expensive first-party games on the service from day one has reportedly hurt the full-price sales Microsoft still relies on.

According to Fortune, Sharma is planning a major Game Pass overhaul that would let players choose some features à la carte, including add-ons for console-only games, cloud gaming, and multiplayer, while keeping a tiered subscription structure.

Read more

• Gaming

Xbox Project Helix is eyeing a 2028 launch, but the price could be as high as $1,800 As per internal estimates, Project Helix could cost between $1,200 to $1,800, unless Microsoft decides to sell it at a loss.

Microsoft has made plenty of waves with its upcoming Project Helix console, and it appears the company is planning a whole family of devices rather than a single gaming box. Beyond the expected performance leap, it seems the upcoming console will deliver another surprise, and not the good kind, mind you. Here's a hint: an astronomical price hike.

According to an expansive profile of Xbox chief Asha Sharma, Microsoft is eyeing a next-gen handheld for 2027, followed by Project Helix in 2028. The catch is the price. The next-gen Xbox could carry a steep asking price unless Microsoft absorbs part of the cost and eats into its margins, or even sells the console at a loss in the hope of making the money back through its services.

Read more

• Computing

AMD drops FSR 4.1 on five-year-old Radeon graphics cards, and Xbox is next AMD just breathed new life into RX 6000 cards months ahead of schedule

AMD gave RX 6000 users some good news earlier this year, but followed it up by making them wait till 2027. But now, Team Red seems to be moving ahead of schedule. FSR Upscaling 4.1 is now officially available on Radeon RX 6000-series graphics cards, with support arriving through the new Adrenalin 26.10.1 driver.

It is still several months earlier than AMD's previous early-2027 target and brings its machine-learning upscaler to a GPU family that first appeared all the way back in 2020. AMD's Jack Huynh confirmed that support stretches from the RX 6900 series down to the RX 6400 class, with the company retuning the model and optimizing its execution for the older architecture.

Read more